|
|
Post by planeshots on Jan 20, 2007 22:33:05 GMT
hi i am nosy and want to no what is your longest FS2004 flight.
mines is Dundee-London (not that far atol!!).
|
|
|
|
Post by sjr on Jan 22, 2007 21:22:56 GMT
That all? I have done the following
Chicago to New York JFK then on to Manchester but this was on FS2000 and therefore doesn't count besides i crashed shortly before landing. The plan was to land at around 13:00 but i arrived at 14:25 and then crash landed in my home town of Knutsford. So if this was real i would actual be dead.
|
|
|
|
Post by sjr on Jan 22, 2007 21:23:29 GMT
No traffic across the atlantic anyways
|
|
|
|
Post by dutchboi on Jan 28, 2007 17:47:59 GMT
My longest is from Curacao Hato international to Amsterdam Schiphol...... I went to school came back and it was still going ok....
|
|
|
|
Post by sjr on Jan 30, 2007 15:37:00 GMT
Thats a long flight then. How long were you gone. I would normally think that a pilot wouldn't leave the cockpit for so long but as it was a simulator i suppose it is different. As a matter of fact i don't think i have ever flown on Fs2000 without getting bored after 2 hours. No traffic means that once your in the air there is nothing to do except check instruments and use the autopilot. If you don't mind me asking what aircraft was this flight done in. As i said New York to Manchester which took about three and a half hours. Guess what aircraft i was flying
|
|
|
|
Post by dutchboi on Feb 1, 2007 12:31:16 GMT
I downloaded an A330 from Projectopensky.com with a 737 cockpit so it was easier to operate, I set it to the fuel so it wouldn't run out on me in the middle of the journey. I go to school for 7 hours it took about 9-10 hrs
|
|
|
|
Post by sjr on Feb 3, 2007 20:06:35 GMT
Not to bad then, i couldn't fly for that long. Especially with no other traffic about and no ATC to talk to. Would just bore me. I only have FS2000 though. When i can i will upgrade
|
|
